![]() which also seem to cannibalize other similar lines. I cannot keep track of their different lines, what is the differences, etc. * Too slow to innovate, fix the USP, and introduce new models and models are confusing when introduced. (a step backwards and 20% worse than the USP45) and you've got competitors that are 13 (Glock 21 or XDM) or 15 (FN FNX 45). Their gun capacities are generally not good. Who wants to spend 3x the price for magazines? And for many of their guns their capacity seems to lag behind the competition in spite of the guns having ample grip well for more ammo (why is a larger USP holding less rounds than the smaller SW M&P or Glock?). I'd be more inclined to overpay for a pistol of magazines were inexpensive. * Too expensive magazines with lesser capacity. ![]() The guns are nice but cannot support their price tags, when guns that perform as well or better are 1/2 the price. Who among us would not want to buy a new P7? Or a MP5 pistol? Make them!!!! * Failure to listen to the consumers and produce what people want. * Neglected the civilian market, which is far larger than police or military contracts.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |